Digital Realty Trust vs Realty Income
DLR and O side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DLR and O compare
Digital Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Realty Income ($66.9B against $54.1B).
On earnings, Realty Income is cheaper: it trades at 41.8× trailing earnings, against 47.6× for Digital Realty Trust.
Digital Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.6% versus 10.9% for Realty Income).
Both pay dividends: Digital Realty Trust yields 2.7% and Realty Income 5.7%.
Realty Income scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Digital Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DLR | O |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $66.9B | $54.1B |
| Share price | $180.70 | $57.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.1% | −3.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 16.2% | −20.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.41 |
| Employees | 4,282 | 395 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.6× | 41.8× (better) |
| P/S | 10.5× | 8.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.2× | 14.5× (better) |
| PEG | 1.00 | – |
| Fair value | $117.73 | $52.62 |
| Margin of safety | −53.5% | −8.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.6% (better) | 10.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% | 28.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 220% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 249% (better) | 33.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.1% (better) | 0.52% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 11.5% | – |
| Net margin | 21.7% | – |
| Return on equity | 6.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 2.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.04 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.21 |
| Interest coverage | 1.6× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.69 (better) | 1.02 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | 5.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 127% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | −3.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 78.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$695K (better) | −$874K |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 4.5% |
Go deeper
- DLR stock overview
- DLR income statement
- DLR valuation and score
- O stock overview
- O income statement
- O valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.