Realty Income vs Weyerhaeuser
O and WY side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How O and WY compare
Realty Income is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Weyerhaeuser ($54.1B against $14.7B).
On earnings, Weyerhaeuser is cheaper: it trades at 32.3× trailing earnings, against 41.8× for Realty Income.
Realty Income grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.9% versus −1.1% for Weyerhaeuser).
Both pay dividends: Realty Income yields 5.7% and Weyerhaeuser 4.1%.
Realty Income scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Weyerhaeuser), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | O | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $54.1B | $14.7B |
| Share price | $57.20 | $20.35 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.4% | −12.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.3% | −46.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 395 | 9,517 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 41.8× | 32.3× (better) |
| P/S | 8.9× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 1.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.5× (better) | 14.8× |
| Fair value | $52.62 | $17.30 |
| Margin of safety | −8.7% (better) | −17.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.9% (better) | −1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.4% (better) | −1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 36.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 33.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.52% (better) | −15.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 15.0% |
| Operating margin | – | 11.7% |
| Net margin | – | 6.5% |
| Return on equity | – | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 (better) | 0.57 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.21 (better) | 3.75 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.1× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.02 | 2.01 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.7% (better) | 4.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 134% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | 10.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −3.6% | 0.27% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% | 4.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 78.7% | 97.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.15% | 0.40% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$874K (better) | −$1.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- O stock overview
- O income statement
- O valuation and score
- WY stock overview
- WY income statement
- WY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.