Realty Income vs Public Storage
O and PSA side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How O and PSA compare
Realty Income and Public Storage are about the same size, with market caps of $54.1B and $57.0B.
On earnings, Public Storage is cheaper: it trades at 31.0× trailing earnings, against 41.8× for Realty Income.
Realty Income grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.9% versus 3.0% for Public Storage).
Both pay dividends: Realty Income yields 5.7% and Public Storage 3.7%.
Public Storage scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Realty Income), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | O | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $54.1B | $57.0B |
| Share price | $57.20 | $324.77 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.4% | 12.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.3% | 0.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 395 | 5,770 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 41.8× | 31.0× (better) |
| P/S | 8.9× (better) | 11.7× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 6.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.5× (better) | 16.1× |
| Fair value | $52.62 | $252.73 |
| Margin of safety | −8.7% (better) | −28.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.9% (better) | 3.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.4% (better) | 10.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 12.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 33.0% (better) | 14.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.52% | 7.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | – | 41.8% |
| Return on equity | – | 22.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.21 (better) | −0.07 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.02 | 3.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.7% (better) | 3.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | 8.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −3.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 78.7% | 87.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.15% | 10.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$874K | −$772K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- O stock overview
- O income statement
- O valuation and score
- PSA stock overview
- PSA income statement
- PSA valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CCI vs O
- CUBE vs PSA
- EXR vs O
- EXR vs PSA
- IRM vs PSA
- LINE vs PSA
- O vs SPG
- O vs VICI
- O vs WY
- PSA vs SPG
- PSA vs VICI
- PSA vs WY
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.