Realty Income vs Simon Property
O and SPG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How O and SPG compare
Simon Property is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Realty Income ($70.5B against $54.1B).
On earnings, Simon Property is cheaper: it trades at 15.4× trailing earnings, against 41.8× for Realty Income.
Simon Property grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.0% versus 10.9% for Realty Income).
Both pay dividends: Realty Income yields 5.7% and Simon Property 4.1%.
Realty Income scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Simon Property), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | O | SPG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $54.1B | $70.5B |
| Share price | $57.20 | $217.75 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.4% | 25.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.3% | 27.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 395 | 3,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 41.8× | 15.4× (better) |
| P/S | 8.9× (better) | 10.2× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 15.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.5× | 14.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 21.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.52 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.6% |
| Fair value | $52.62 | $214.00 |
| Margin of safety | −8.7% | −1.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.9% | 15.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.4% (better) | 6.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 33.0% | 119% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.52% | 31.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 47.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 46.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 112% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.21 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.1× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.02 | 1.52 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.7% (better) | 4.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | 7.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −3.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% | 4.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 78.7% | 93.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.15% | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$874K | −$448K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- O stock overview
- O income statement
- O valuation and score
- SPG stock overview
- SPG income statement
- SPG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.