Digital Realty Trust vs Iron Mountain
DLR and IRM side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DLR and IRM compare
Digital Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Iron Mountain ($66.9B against $34.7B).
On earnings, Digital Realty Trust is cheaper: it trades at 47.6× trailing earnings, against 83.3× for Iron Mountain.
Iron Mountain grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.4% versus 12.6% for Digital Realty Trust).
Both pay dividends: Digital Realty Trust yields 2.7% and Iron Mountain 3.0%.
Digital Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Iron Mountain), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DLR | IRM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $66.9B | $34.7B |
| Share price | $180.70 | $116.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.1% | 15.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 16.2% | 145% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 4,282 | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.6× (better) | 83.3× |
| P/S | 10.5× | 4.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.2× | 20.8× (better) |
| PEG | 1.00 | – |
| FCF yield | – | −1.4% |
| Fair value | $117.73 | $66.73 |
| Margin of safety | −53.5% (better) | −74.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.6% | 17.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% | 10.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 220% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 249% | 900% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.1% (better) | −16.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 54.2% |
| Operating margin | 11.5% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 21.7% | – |
| FCF margin | – | −6.5% |
| Return on equity | 6.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 2.9% | 8.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 6.84 |
| Interest coverage | 1.6× | 1.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | – | 0.73 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.69 (better) | 1.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | 3.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 127% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 86.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.03% | 0.83% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$695K (better) | −$112M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- DLR stock overview
- DLR income statement
- DLR valuation and score
- IRM stock overview
- IRM income statement
- IRM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.