American Tower vs Digital Realty Trust
AMT and DLR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMT and DLR compare
American Tower is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Digital Realty Trust ($87.5B against $66.9B).
On earnings, American Tower is cheaper: it trades at 25.8× trailing earnings, against 47.6× for Digital Realty Trust.
Digital Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.6% versus 6.6% for American Tower).
Both pay dividends: American Tower yields 3.8% and Digital Realty Trust 2.7%.
Digital Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for American Tower), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMT | DLR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $87.5B | $66.9B |
| Share price | $187.78 | $180.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.9% | 8.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −32.4% | 16.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.59 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 4,866 | 4,282 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.8× (better) | 47.6× |
| P/S | 8.0× (better) | 10.5× |
| P/B | 23.5× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.6× (better) | 24.2× |
| P/FCF | 22.1× | – |
| PEG | 2.11 | 1.00 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | – |
| Fair value | $184.63 | $117.73 |
| Margin of safety | −1.7% (better) | −53.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.6% | 12.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | 9.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 220% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 164% | 249% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.3% | 29.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 44.8% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net margin | – | 21.7% |
| FCF margin | 36.2% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 6.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.2% (better) | 2.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 10.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.08 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.5× (better) | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 0.35 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.20 | 1.69 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.8% (better) | 2.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 127% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% (better) | 2.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.5% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 0.09% | 0.03% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.2M | −$695K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.6% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- AMT stock overview
- AMT income statement
- AMT valuation and score
- DLR stock overview
- DLR income statement
- DLR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.