Digital Realty Trust vs Prologis
DLR and PLD side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DLR and PLD compare
Prologis is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Digital Realty Trust ($119B against $66.9B).
On earnings, Prologis is cheaper: it trades at 28.5× trailing earnings, against 47.6× for Digital Realty Trust.
Digital Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.6% versus 7.3% for Prologis).
Prologis keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 45.8% compared with 21.7% at Digital Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Digital Realty Trust yields 2.7% and Prologis 3.3%.
Prologis scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Digital Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DLR | PLD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $66.9B | $119B |
| Share price | $180.70 | $127.98 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.1% | 3.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 16.2% | −12.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 4,282 | 2,802 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.6× | 28.5× (better) |
| P/S | 10.5× (better) | 13.0× |
| P/B | 2.9× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.2× | 15.7× (better) |
| PEG | 1.00 | – |
| Fair value | $117.73 | $112.97 |
| Margin of safety | −53.5% | −13.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.6% (better) | 7.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% | 14.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 220% (better) | 22.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 249% (better) | 21.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.1% (better) | 12.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 11.5% | 54.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 21.7% | 45.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.2% | 7.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.9% | 9.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 1.6× | 4.8× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.69 | 1.91 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | 3.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 127% | 92.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.03% | 0.24% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$695K (better) | −$8.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | – |
Go deeper
- DLR stock overview
- DLR income statement
- DLR valuation and score
- PLD stock overview
- PLD income statement
- PLD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.