Kimco Realty vs Simon Property
KIM and SPG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KIM and SPG compare
Simon Property is the larger company, worth 4.3 times as much as Kimco Realty ($70.5B against $16.4B).
On earnings, Simon Property is cheaper: it trades at 15.4× trailing earnings, against 28.8× for Kimco Realty.
Simon Property grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.0% versus 4.4% for Kimco Realty).
Both pay dividends: Kimco Realty yields 4.3% and Simon Property 4.1%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KIM | SPG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.4B | $70.5B |
| Share price | $24.52 | $217.75 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | 25.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.74% | 27.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 710 | 3,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.8× | 15.4× (better) |
| P/S | 7.5× (better) | 10.2× |
| P/B | 1.6× (better) | 15.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.3× (better) | 14.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 21.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.52 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.6% |
| Fair value | $22.03 | $214.00 |
| Margin of safety | −11.3% | −1.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.4% | 15.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.1% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.4% | 119% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 31.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 36.0% | 47.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 27.8% | – |
| FCF margin | – | 46.4% |
| Return on equity | 5.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 7.9% | 112% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.3× | 3.1× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.23 | 1.52 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% (better) | 4.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.3% (better) | 7.3% |
| Buyback yield | 1.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% (better) | 4.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.5% | 93.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$199K (better) | −$448K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- KIM stock overview
- KIM income statement
- KIM valuation and score
- SPG stock overview
- SPG income statement
- SPG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.