Kimco Realty vs Vornado Realty Trust
KIM and VNO side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KIM and VNO compare
Kimco Realty is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Vornado Realty Trust ($16.4B against $6.5B).
On earnings, Kimco Realty is cheaper: it trades at 28.8× trailing earnings, against 1728× for Vornado Realty Trust.
Kimco Realty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.4% versus 1.4% for Vornado Realty Trust).
Kimco Realty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.8% compared with 3.7% at Vornado Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Kimco Realty yields 4.3% and Vornado Realty Trust 2.1%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KIM | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.4B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $24.52 | $34.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | −8.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.74% | −22.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 710 | 3,145 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.8× (better) | 1728× |
| P/S | 7.5× | 3.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.3× | 10.2× (better) |
| Fair value | $22.03 | $36.21 |
| Margin of safety | −11.3% | 4.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.4% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.1% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1.6% (better) | −92.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.4% (better) | −99.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 36.0% | – |
| Net margin | 27.8% (better) | 3.7% |
| Return on equity | 5.8% (better) | 1.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 7.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.3× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.23 (better) | 0.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% (better) | 2.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.3% (better) | −20.8% |
| Buyback yield | 1.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 8.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$199K | $819K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | – |
Go deeper
- KIM stock overview
- KIM income statement
- KIM valuation and score
- VNO stock overview
- VNO income statement
- VNO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.