Kimco Realty vs Mid America Apartment Communities
KIM and MAA side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KIM and MAA compare
Kimco Realty is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Mid America Apartment Communities ($16.4B against $13.6B).
On earnings, Kimco Realty is cheaper: it trades at 28.8× trailing earnings, against 35.5× for Mid America Apartment Communities.
Kimco Realty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.4% versus 0.77% for Mid America Apartment Communities).
Kimco Realty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.8% compared with 17.6% at Mid America Apartment Communities.
Both pay dividends: Kimco Realty yields 4.3% and Mid America Apartment Communities 5.2%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KIM | MAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.4B | $13.6B |
| Share price | $24.52 | $117.21 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | −7.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.74% | −42.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 710 | 2,507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.8× (better) | 35.5× |
| P/S | 7.5× | 6.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× (better) | 2.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.3× | 11.0× (better) |
| Fair value | $22.03 | $107.74 |
| Margin of safety | −11.3% | −8.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.4% (better) | 0.77% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.1% (better) | 5.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1.6% (better) | −31.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.4% (better) | −31.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 11.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 36.0% | – |
| Net margin | 27.8% (better) | 17.6% |
| Return on equity | 5.8% | 6.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.3× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.23 | 1.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% | 5.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 182% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.3% (better) | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | 1.0% (better) | −0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% (better) | 5.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.5% | 97.0% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 0.66% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$199K (better) | −$923K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- KIM stock overview
- KIM income statement
- KIM valuation and score
- MAA stock overview
- MAA income statement
- MAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.