Kimco Realty vs Regency Centers
KIM and REG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KIM and REG compare
Kimco Realty is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Regency Centers ($16.4B against $13.7B).
Regency Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 4.4% for Kimco Realty).
Regency Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.4% compared with 27.8% at Kimco Realty.
Both pay dividends: Kimco Realty yields 4.3% and Regency Centers 4.0%.
Regency Centers scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Kimco Realty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KIM | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.4B | $13.7B |
| Share price | $24.52 | $74.59 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | 7.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.74% | −1.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 710 | 507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.8× | – |
| P/S | 7.5× (better) | 8.4× |
| P/B | 1.6× (better) | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.3× | 8.6× (better) |
| Fair value | $22.03 | $73.72 |
| Margin of safety | −11.3% | −1.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.4% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.1% (better) | 8.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1.6% | 37.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 36.0% | 72.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 27.8% | 34.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.8% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.9% | 13.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.3× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.23 | 1.79 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% (better) | 4.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 95.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.3% (better) | 3.8% |
| Buyback yield | 1.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% (better) | 4.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.5% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$199K (better) | −$40.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | – |
Go deeper
- KIM stock overview
- KIM income statement
- KIM valuation and score
- REG stock overview
- REG income statement
- REG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.