Alexandria Real Estate Equities vs Kimco Realty
ARE and KIM side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ARE and KIM compare
Kimco Realty is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Alexandria Real Estate Equities ($16.4B against $7.0B).
Kimco Realty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.4% versus −8.4% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities).
Kimco Realty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.8% compared with −36.1% at Alexandria Real Estate Equities.
Both pay dividends: Alexandria Real Estate Equities yields 7.2% and Kimco Realty 4.3%.
Kimco Realty scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Alexandria Real Estate Equities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ARE | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.0B | $16.4B |
| Share price | $40.20 | $24.52 |
| Change, 1 year | −31.6% | 14.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −80.5% | 0.74% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 514 | 710 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 28.8× |
| P/S | 2.5× (better) | 7.5× |
| P/B | 0.5× (better) | 1.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.3× |
| Fair value | $91.24 | $22.03 |
| Margin of safety | 55.9% (better) | −11.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.4% | 4.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.9% | 15.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 1.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 2.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 36.0% |
| Net margin | −36.1% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −6.3% | 5.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 7.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 2.3× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.35 | 1.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.2% (better) | 4.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.0% | 13.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 1.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 7.2% (better) | 5.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.4% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.3M (better) | −$199K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- ARE stock overview
- ARE income statement
- ARE valuation and score
- KIM stock overview
- KIM income statement
- KIM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.