Fifth Third Bancorp vs Regions Financial
FITB and RF side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FITB and RF compare
Fifth Third Bancorp is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Regions Financial ($49.4B against $24.6B).
On earnings, Regions Financial is cheaper: it trades at 11.3× trailing earnings, against 18.7× for Fifth Third Bancorp.
Fifth Third Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.5% versus 3.4% for Regions Financial).
Regions Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.9% compared with 21.9% at Fifth Third Bancorp.
Both pay dividends: Fifth Third Bancorp yields 3.0% and Regions Financial 3.8%.
Regions Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for Fifth Third Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FITB | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $49.4B | $24.6B |
| Share price | $54.50 | $28.86 |
| Change, 1 year | 26.1% | 13.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 25.1% | 21.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 19K | 20K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.7× | 11.3× (better) |
| P/S | 4.2× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.7× | – |
| PEG | 10.61 (better) | 38.67 |
| FCF yield | 5.6% | – |
| Fair value | $41.69 | $27.48 |
| Margin of safety | −30.7% | −5.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 32.5% (better) | 3.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 74.4% | 146% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.3% | 6.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −12.8% | 12.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.0% | 17.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 21.9% | 29.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 23.8% | – |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | 12.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 (better) | 0.25 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.27 (better) | 0.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.0% | 3.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 55.0% | 40.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 (better) | 13 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.4% | 10.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 4.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.0% | 7.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.4% | 85.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.44% | 0.34% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$13.6M | −$1.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.3% | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- FITB stock overview
- FITB income statement
- FITB valuation and score
- RF stock overview
- RF income statement
- RF valuation and score
Other comparisons
- ALLY vs FITB
- CFG vs FITB
- CFG vs RF
- FCNCA vs FITB
- FHN vs RF
- FITB vs KEY
- FITB vs NTRS
- FITB vs STT
- KEY vs RF
- PNFP vs RF
- RF vs SNUS.PH
- RF vs TFC
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.