KeyCorp vs Regions Financial
KEY and RF side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KEY and RF compare
KeyCorp and Regions Financial are about the same size, with market caps of $22.5B and $24.3B.
On earnings, Regions Financial is cheaper: it trades at 11.6× trailing earnings, against 12.3× for KeyCorp.
KeyCorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (51.1% versus 4.4% for Regions Financial).
Regions Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.3% compared with 26.0% at KeyCorp.
Both pay dividends: KeyCorp yields 3.9% and Regions Financial 3.8%.
KeyCorp scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for Regions Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KEY | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.5B | $24.3B |
| Share price | $21.12 | $28.57 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.4% | 18.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −10.8% | 17.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 18K | 20K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.3× | 11.6× (better) |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 3.2× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/FCF | 18.8× | – |
| PEG | – | 39.84 |
| FCF yield | 5.3% | – |
| Fair value | $20.39 | $27.63 |
| Margin of safety | −3.6% | −3.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 51.1% (better) | 4.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.3% | 146% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1053% (better) | 7.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 14.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 17.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 26.0% | 29.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 10.3% | 11.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.16 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.24 | 0.24 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.9% (better) | 3.8% |
| Payout ratio | 51.4% | 41.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 13 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | 10.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −0.06% | 4.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% | 8.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.5% | 85.4% |
| Held by insiders | 15.6% | 0.34% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.2M | −$1.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 7.5% |
Go deeper
- KEY stock overview
- KEY income statement
- KEY valuation and score
- RF stock overview
- RF income statement
- RF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.