Truist Financial vs Wells Fargo &
TFC and WFC side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TFC and WFC compare
Wells Fargo & is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as Truist Financial ($252B against $59.6B).
On earnings, Truist Financial is cheaper: it trades at 11.2× trailing earnings, against 12.1× for Wells Fargo &.
Wells Fargo & grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.2% versus 4.1% for Truist Financial).
Both pay dividends: Truist Financial yields 4.3% and Wells Fargo & 2.2%.
Truist Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Wells Fargo &), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TFC | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $59.6B | $252B |
| Share price | $48.79 | $83.40 |
| Change, 1 year | 11.1% | −3.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.1% | 65.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 59K | 205K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.2× (better) | 12.1× |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.4× |
| PEG | – | 0.50 |
| Fair value | $59.13 | $77.51 |
| Margin of safety | 17.5% (better) | −7.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.1% | 6.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.2% | 2.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 9.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.5% (better) | 17.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.4% | 70.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | – | 26.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 12.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.42 | 0.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.18 | 0.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% (better) | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 24.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | 6.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 6.0% | 7.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 10.3% (better) | 9.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.3% | 77.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.20% | 0.17% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$10.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | 9 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | – |
Go deeper
- TFC stock overview
- TFC income statement
- TFC valuation and score
- WFC stock overview
- WFC income statement
- WFC valuation and score
Other comparisons
- BAC vs WFC
- C vs WFC
- COF vs TFC
- COF vs WFC
- KEY vs TFC
- PNC vs TFC
- RF vs TFC
- SNUS.PH vs TFC
- TFC vs USB
- USB vs WFC
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.