Regency Centers vs UDR
REG and UDR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How REG and UDR compare
Regency Centers is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as UDR ($13.7B against $11.4B).
Regency Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 1.5% for UDR).
Regency Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.4% compared with 30.4% at UDR.
Both pay dividends: Regency Centers yields 4.0% and UDR 4.1%.
UDR scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 14 for Regency Centers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | REG | UDR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.7B | $11.4B |
| Share price | $74.59 | $35.52 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.6% | 5.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −1.8% | −35.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 507 | 1,420 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 22.6× |
| P/S | 8.4× | 6.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.6× (better) | 9.5× |
| PEG | – | 0.36 |
| Fair value | $73.72 | $53.29 |
| Margin of safety | −1.2% | 33.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.2% (better) | 1.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 6.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 37.8% | 296% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 313% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 41.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 72.0% (better) | 40.8% |
| Net margin | 34.4% (better) | 30.4% |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | 16.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.9% | 22.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.6× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.79 (better) | 1.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.0% | 4.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 95.7% | 109% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.8% (better) | 3.8% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.0% | 7.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.52% | 0.47% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$40.9M | −$3.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- REG stock overview
- REG income statement
- REG valuation and score
- UDR stock overview
- UDR income statement
- UDR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.