Equity LifeStyle Properties vs UDR
ELS and UDR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ELS and UDR compare
Equity LifeStyle Properties and UDR are about the same size, with market caps of $11.5B and $11.4B.
On earnings, UDR is cheaper: it trades at 22.6× trailing earnings, against 28.7× for Equity LifeStyle Properties.
Equity LifeStyle Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus 1.5% for UDR).
UDR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.4% compared with 26.6% at Equity LifeStyle Properties.
Both pay dividends: Equity LifeStyle Properties yields 3.6% and UDR 4.1%.
UDR scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Equity LifeStyle Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ELS | UDR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.5B | $11.4B |
| Share price | $59.03 | $35.52 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.4% | 5.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −30.4% | −35.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.42 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 3,200 | 1,420 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.7× | 22.6× (better) |
| P/S | 7.3× | 6.6× (better) |
| P/B | 6.5× | 3.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.4× | 9.5× (better) |
| PEG | 3.01 | 0.36 (better) |
| Fair value | $54.02 | $53.29 |
| Margin of safety | −9.3% | 33.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.5% (better) | 1.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | 6.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7.8% | 296% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.9% | 313% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.0% | 41.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 26.2% | 40.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 26.6% | 30.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 23.8% (better) | 16.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.9% | 22.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.0× | 3.6× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.23 (better) | 1.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% | 4.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 97.1% | 109% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.8% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% | 7.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.71% | 0.47% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$202K (better) | −$3.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.4% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- ELS stock overview
- ELS income statement
- ELS valuation and score
- UDR stock overview
- UDR income statement
- UDR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.