Mid America Apartment Communities vs UDR
MAA and UDR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAA and UDR compare
Mid America Apartment Communities is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as UDR ($13.6B against $11.4B).
On earnings, UDR is cheaper: it trades at 22.6× trailing earnings, against 35.5× for Mid America Apartment Communities.
UDR grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.5% versus 0.77% for Mid America Apartment Communities).
UDR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.4% compared with 17.6% at Mid America Apartment Communities.
Both pay dividends: Mid America Apartment Communities yields 5.2% and UDR 4.1%.
UDR scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Mid America Apartment Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAA | UDR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.6B | $11.4B |
| Share price | $117.21 | $35.52 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.2% | 5.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −42.1% | −35.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 2,507 | 1,420 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.5× | 22.6× (better) |
| P/S | 6.1× (better) | 6.6× |
| P/B | 2.5× (better) | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.0× | 9.5× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.36 |
| Fair value | $107.74 | $53.29 |
| Margin of safety | −8.8% | 33.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.77% | 1.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | 6.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.1% | 296% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −31.3% | 313% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.5% | 41.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 40.8% |
| Net margin | 17.6% | 30.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.8% | 16.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 22.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 3.6× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.48 (better) | 1.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.2% (better) | 4.1% |
| Payout ratio | 182% | 109% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.7% (better) | 3.8% |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% | 3.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% | 7.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.0% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.66% | 0.47% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$923K (better) | −$3.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- MAA stock overview
- MAA income statement
- MAA valuation and score
- UDR stock overview
- UDR income statement
- UDR valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AMH vs UDR
- ARE vs MAA
- BXP vs MAA
- ELS vs UDR
- ESS vs MAA
- ESS vs UDR
- KIM vs MAA
- MAA vs SUI
- SUI vs UDR
- UDR vs VNO
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.