UDR vs Vornado Realty Trust
UDR and VNO side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How UDR and VNO compare
UDR is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Vornado Realty Trust ($11.4B against $6.5B).
On earnings, UDR is cheaper: it trades at 22.6× trailing earnings, against 1728× for Vornado Realty Trust.
UDR grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.5% versus 1.4% for Vornado Realty Trust).
UDR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.4% compared with 3.7% at Vornado Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: UDR yields 4.1% and Vornado Realty Trust 2.1%.
UDR scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Vornado Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | UDR | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.4B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $35.52 | $34.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.8% | −8.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.2% | −22.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 1,420 | 3,145 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.6× (better) | 1728× |
| P/S | 6.6× | 3.5× (better) |
| P/B | 3.9× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5× (better) | 10.2× |
| PEG | 0.36 | – |
| Fair value | $53.29 | $36.21 |
| Margin of safety | 33.3% (better) | 4.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.5% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.6% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 296% (better) | −92.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 313% (better) | −99.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 41.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 40.8% | – |
| Net margin | 30.4% (better) | 3.7% |
| Return on equity | 16.7% (better) | 1.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 22.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 3.6× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.46 (better) | 0.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% (better) | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | 109% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.8% (better) | −20.8% |
| Buyback yield | 3.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.47% | 8.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.1M | $819K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | – |
Go deeper
- UDR stock overview
- UDR income statement
- UDR valuation and score
- VNO stock overview
- VNO income statement
- VNO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.