Lineage vs Weyerhaeuser
LINE and WY side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LINE and WY compare
Weyerhaeuser is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Lineage ($14.7B against $8.2B).
Lineage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.0% versus −1.1% for Weyerhaeuser).
Weyerhaeuser keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.5% compared with −3.1% at Lineage.
Both pay dividends: Lineage yields 5.9% and Weyerhaeuser 4.1%.
Lineage scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Weyerhaeuser), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LINE | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.2B | $14.7B |
| Share price | $36.00 | $20.35 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.9% | −12.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −46.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 24K | 9,517 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 32.3× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.7× (better) | 14.8× |
| P/FCF | 33.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.0% | – |
| Fair value | $39.23 | $17.30 |
| Margin of safety | 8.2% (better) | −17.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.0% (better) | −1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 36.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −15.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.0% (better) | 15.0% |
| Operating margin | 3.6% | 11.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.1% | 6.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.5% | – |
| Return on equity | −2.0% | 4.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.1% | 5.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.79 | 0.57 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.50 | 3.75 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× | 3.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.78 | 1.82 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.58 | 2.01 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.9% (better) | 4.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 134% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 10.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.9% (better) | 4.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.7% | 97.4% |
| Held by insiders | – | 0.40% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $7.1M (better) | −$1.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- LINE stock overview
- LINE income statement
- LINE valuation and score
- WY stock overview
- WY income statement
- WY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.