Public Storage vs VICI Properties
PSA and VICI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PSA and VICI compare
Public Storage is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as VICI Properties ($57.0B against $26.9B).
On earnings, VICI Properties is cheaper: it trades at 9.5× trailing earnings, against 31.0× for Public Storage.
VICI Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.4% versus 3.0% for Public Storage).
VICI Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 67.5% compared with 41.8% at Public Storage.
Both pay dividends: Public Storage yields 3.7% and VICI Properties 7.4%.
VICI Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 12 for Public Storage), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PSA | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $57.0B | $26.9B |
| Share price | $324.77 | $24.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.3% | −17.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.59% | −17.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.56 |
| Employees | 5,770 | 152 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.0× | 9.5× (better) |
| P/S | 11.7× | 6.6× (better) |
| P/B | 6.2× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.1× | – |
| PEG | – | 0.35 |
| Fair value | $252.73 | $41.39 |
| Margin of safety | −28.5% | 40.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.0% | 4.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.6% | 26.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 12.9% (better) | 0.35% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 14.3% (better) | −1.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.5% | 8.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 99.3% |
| Net margin | 41.8% | 67.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 22.0% (better) | 9.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.07 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 3.31 (better) | 1.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% | 7.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 68.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 7 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.4% (better) | 7.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% | 7.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.1% | 95.8% |
| Held by insiders | 10.0% | 0.29% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$772K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- PSA stock overview
- PSA income statement
- PSA valuation and score
- VICI stock overview
- VICI income statement
- VICI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.