Keysight Technologies vs Teledyne Technologies
KEYS and TDY side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KEYS and TDY compare
Keysight Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Teledyne Technologies ($50.7B against $29.6B).
On earnings, Teledyne Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 29.5× trailing earnings, against 40.8× for Keysight Technologies.
Keysight Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.5% versus 8.6% for Teledyne Technologies).
Keysight Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.1% compared with 15.8% at Teledyne Technologies.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KEYS | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $50.7B | $29.6B |
| Share price | $297.68 | $643.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.7% | 23.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 52.9% | 44.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.42 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 17K | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 14 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 40.8× | 29.5× (better) |
| P/S | 7.7× | 4.5× (better) |
| P/B | 7.7× | 2.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 38.0× | 18.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 34.5× | 25.8× (better) |
| PEG | – | 6.50 |
| FCF yield | 2.9% | 3.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $233.96 | $566.26 |
| Margin of safety | −27.2% | −13.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.5% (better) | 8.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.0% | 14.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | 25.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | 26.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.2% | 12.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.7% (better) | 43.6% |
| Operating margin | 20.3% (better) | 20.0% |
| Net margin | 19.1% (better) | 15.8% |
| FCF margin | 22.3% (better) | 17.6% |
| Return on equity | 20.6% (better) | 9.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 21.3% (better) | 8.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 | 0.18 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.07 | 0.89 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 12.3× | 26.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.02 | 2.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.83 (better) | 5.57 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.6% | 98.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.72% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$27.7M | −$14.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.3% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- KEYS stock overview
- KEYS income statement
- KEYS valuation and score
- TDY stock overview
- TDY income statement
- TDY valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AME vs KEYS
- COHR vs KEYS
- DRS vs TDY
- FTV vs KEYS
- GRMN vs TDY
- KEYS vs KLAC
- KEYS vs MKSI
- KEYS vs RAL
- KEYS vs ROP
- KEYS vs TER
- KEYS vs TRMB
- LHX vs TDY
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.