Keysight Technologies vs KLA
KEYS and KLAC side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KEYS and KLAC compare
KLA is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Keysight Technologies ($206B against $52.3B).
On earnings, KLA is cheaper: it trades at 39.5× trailing earnings, against 42.1× for Keysight Technologies.
Keysight Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.5% versus 15.8% for KLA).
KLA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 36.2% compared with 19.1% at Keysight Technologies.
KLA pays a dividend yielding 0.53%; Keysight Technologies does not pay one.
KLA scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 14 for Keysight Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KEYS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $52.3B | $206B |
| Share price | $307.20 | $157.91 |
| Change, 1 year | 80.2% | 27.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 67.2% | 279% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 1.74 |
| Employees | 17K | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 42.1× | 39.5× (better) |
| P/S | 7.9× (better) | 14.2× |
| P/B | 8.0× (better) | 31.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 39.2× | 30.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 35.6× (better) | 51.1× |
| PEG | – | 2.66 |
| FCF yield | 2.8% (better) | 2.0% |
| Fair value | $245.85 | $130.03 |
| Margin of safety | −25.0% | −21.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.5% (better) | 15.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.0% | 14.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | 24.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | 25.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.2% | 22.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.7% (better) | 61.5% |
| Operating margin | 20.3% | – |
| Net margin | 19.1% | 36.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 22.3% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 20.6% | 91.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 21.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.07 | – |
| Interest coverage | 12.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.02 | 2.76 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.01 | 12.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.53% |
| Payout ratio | – | 21.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 10 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 17.3% |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% | 1.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.6% | 91.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.72% | 0.11% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.5M (better) | −$112M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | 1.9% |
Go deeper
- KEYS stock overview
- KEYS income statement
- KEYS valuation and score
- KLAC stock overview
- KLAC income statement
- KLAC valuation and score
Other comparisons
- A vs KLAC
- AME vs KEYS
- COHR vs KEYS
- COHR vs KLAC
- FTV vs KEYS
- GLW vs KLAC
- KEYS vs MKSI
- KEYS vs RAL
- KEYS vs ROP
- KEYS vs ST
- KEYS vs TER
- KEYS vs TRMB
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.