Keysight Technologies vs Teradyne
KEYS and TER side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KEYS and TER compare
Keysight Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Teradyne ($52.3B against $42.9B).
On earnings, Teradyne is cheaper: it trades at 31.5× trailing earnings, against 42.1× for Keysight Technologies.
Teradyne grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (74.9% versus 25.5% for Keysight Technologies).
Teradyne keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.5% compared with 19.1% at Keysight Technologies.
Teradyne pays a dividend yielding 0.19%; Keysight Technologies does not pay one.
Teradyne scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 14 for Keysight Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KEYS | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $52.3B | $42.9B |
| Share price | $307.20 | $274.37 |
| Change, 1 year | 80.2% | 57.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 67.2% | 90.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 17K | 6,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 42.1× | 31.5× (better) |
| P/S | 7.9× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/B | 8.0× (better) | 11.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 39.2× | 24.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 35.6× (better) | 41.9× |
| FCF yield | 2.8% (better) | 2.4% |
| Fair value | $245.85 | $295.83 |
| Margin of safety | −25.0% | 7.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.5% | 74.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.0% (better) | 0.44% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 132% | 210% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 132% | 217% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.2% (better) | −4.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.7% (better) | 59.3% |
| Operating margin | 20.3% | 32.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 19.1% | 27.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 22.3% (better) | 20.5% |
| Return on equity | 20.6% | 42.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 21.3% | 47.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.07 | −0.26 |
| Interest coverage | 12.3× | 147× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.02 | 2.08 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.01 | 17.66 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.19% |
| Payout ratio | – | 5.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.7% |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.83% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | 1.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.6% | 97.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.72% | 0.25% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.5M | −$14.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | 5.5% |
Go deeper
- KEYS stock overview
- KEYS income statement
- KEYS valuation and score
- TER stock overview
- TER income statement
- TER valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AME vs KEYS
- COHR vs KEYS
- FTV vs KEYS
- KEYS vs KLAC
- KEYS vs MKSI
- KEYS vs RAL
- KEYS vs ROP
- KEYS vs ST
- KEYS vs TRMB
- MKSI vs TER
- TER vs VLTO
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.