Leonardo DRS vs Teledyne Technologies
DRS and TDY side by side, both in measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DRS and TDY compare
Teledyne Technologies is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Leonardo DRS ($30.5B against $10.1B).
On earnings, Leonardo DRS is cheaper: it trades at 31.7× trailing earnings, against 31.8× for Teledyne Technologies.
Leonardo DRS grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.5% versus 7.9% for Teledyne Technologies).
Teledyne Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.3% compared with 8.5% at Leonardo DRS.
Leonardo DRS pays a dividend yielding 0.96%; Teledyne Technologies does not pay one.
Leonardo DRS scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for Teledyne Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DRS | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.1B | $30.5B |
| Share price | $37.68 | $658.23 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.0% | 27.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 257% | 47.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 7,300 | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.7× (better) | 31.8× |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 4.8× |
| P/B | 3.6× | 2.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.1× (better) | 20.4× |
| P/FCF | 27.7× | 26.7× (better) |
| PEG | – | 7.03 |
| FCF yield | 3.6% | 3.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $37.78 | $557.98 |
| Margin of safety | 0.26% (better) | −18.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.5% (better) | 7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 14.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.8% (better) | 13.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.0% (better) | 13.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 20.8% (better) | 12.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.9% | 43.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 10.5% | 19.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.5% | 15.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.6% | 17.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.9% (better) | 9.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.3% (better) | 8.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.05 (better) | 0.19 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.24 | 1.07 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 24.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.92 | 2.18 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.10 | 5.72 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.26% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 26.6% | 97.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.32% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.1M (better) | −$11.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.2% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- DRS stock overview
- DRS income statement
- DRS valuation and score
- TDY stock overview
- TDY income statement
- TDY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.