Keysight Technologies vs Ralliant
KEYS and RAL side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KEYS and RAL compare
Keysight Technologies is the larger company, worth 7.0 times as much as Ralliant ($52.3B against $7.4B).
Keysight Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.5% versus 5.9% for Ralliant).
Keysight Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.1% compared with −56.4% at Ralliant.
Ralliant pays a dividend yielding 0.30%; Keysight Technologies does not pay one.
Keysight Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Ralliant), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KEYS | RAL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $52.3B | $7.4B |
| Share price | $307.20 | $67.21 |
| Change, 1 year | 80.2% | 54.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 67.2% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 17K | 7,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 42.1× | – |
| P/S | 7.9× | 3.4× (better) |
| P/B | 8.0× | 4.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 39.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 35.6× | 22.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.8% | 4.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $245.85 | $52.33 |
| Margin of safety | −25.0% (better) | −28.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.5% (better) | 5.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.0% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | −532% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | −538% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.7% (better) | 50.9% |
| Operating margin | 20.3% (better) | −53.3% |
| Net margin | 19.1% (better) | −56.4% |
| FCF margin | 22.3% (better) | 15.0% |
| Return on equity | 20.6% (better) | −53.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 21.3% (better) | −28.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 (better) | 0.75 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.07 | – |
| Interest coverage | 12.3× (better) | −19.2× |
| Current ratio | 2.02 (better) | 1.52 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.01 (better) | 1.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.30% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.30% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.6% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 0.72% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.5M | −$3.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- KEYS stock overview
- KEYS income statement
- KEYS valuation and score
- RAL stock overview
- RAL income statement
- RAL valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AME vs KEYS
- CGNX vs RAL
- COHR vs KEYS
- FTV vs KEYS
- FTV vs RAL
- KEYS vs KLAC
- KEYS vs MKSI
- KEYS vs ROP
- KEYS vs ST
- KEYS vs TER
- KEYS vs TRMB
- RAL vs ST
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.