Ametek vs Keysight Technologies
AME and KEYS side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AME and KEYS compare
Ametek and Keysight Technologies are about the same size, with market caps of $55.3B and $52.3B.
On earnings, Ametek is cheaper: it trades at 35.3× trailing earnings, against 42.1× for Keysight Technologies.
Keysight Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.5% versus 12.7% for Ametek).
Ametek keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.0% compared with 19.1% at Keysight Technologies.
Ametek pays a dividend yielding 0.55%; Keysight Technologies does not pay one.
Ametek scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 14 for Keysight Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AME | KEYS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $55.3B | $52.3B |
| Share price | $241.12 | $307.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.9% | 80.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 71.1% | 67.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 13K | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.3× (better) | 42.1× |
| P/S | 7.0× (better) | 7.9× |
| P/B | 4.9× (better) | 8.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.1× (better) | 39.2× |
| P/FCF | 30.3× (better) | 35.6× |
| PEG | 4.15 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.3% (better) | 2.8% |
| Fair value | $207.73 | $245.85 |
| Margin of safety | −16.1% (better) | −25.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.7% | 25.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.3% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.6% | 132% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.1% | 132% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.2% (better) | 8.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.4% | 64.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 25.9% (better) | 20.3% |
| Net margin | 20.0% (better) | 19.1% |
| FCF margin | 23.2% (better) | 22.3% |
| Return on equity | 14.6% | 20.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.7% | 21.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.18 (better) | 0.38 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.63 (better) | −0.07 |
| Interest coverage | 21.1× (better) | 12.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.21 | 2.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.23 (better) | 8.01 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | – |
| Payout ratio | 18.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.80% | 1.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.7% | 90.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.37% | 0.72% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$28.5M (better) | −$32.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 1.4% |
Go deeper
- AME stock overview
- AME income statement
- AME valuation and score
- KEYS stock overview
- KEYS income statement
- KEYS valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AME vs COHR
- AME vs ROP
- AME vs ST
- COHR vs KEYS
- FTV vs KEYS
- KEYS vs KLAC
- KEYS vs MKSI
- KEYS vs RAL
- KEYS vs ROP
- KEYS vs ST
- KEYS vs TER
- KEYS vs TRMB
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.