Garmin vs Keysight Technologies
GRMN and KEYS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GRMN and KEYS compare
Garmin and Keysight Technologies are about the same size, with market caps of $52.6B and $52.3B.
On earnings, Garmin is cheaper: it trades at 28.1× trailing earnings, against 42.1× for Keysight Technologies.
Keysight Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.5% versus 13.5% for Garmin).
Garmin keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.5% compared with 19.1% at Keysight Technologies.
Garmin pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; Keysight Technologies does not pay one.
Garmin scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 14 for Keysight Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GRMN | KEYS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $52.6B | $52.3B |
| Share price | $272.67 | $307.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.2% | 80.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 91.8% | 67.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 6,500 | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.1× (better) | 42.1× |
| P/S | 6.9× (better) | 7.9× |
| P/B | 5.8× (better) | 8.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.6× (better) | 39.2× |
| P/FCF | 32.9× (better) | 35.6× |
| PEG | 1.45 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.0% (better) | 2.8% |
| Fair value | $247.45 | $245.85 |
| Margin of safety | −10.2% (better) | −25.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.5% | 25.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.6% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 19.7% | 132% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 19.8% | 132% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.7% (better) | 8.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.1% | 64.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 27.6% (better) | 20.3% |
| Net margin | 24.5% (better) | 19.1% |
| FCF margin | 20.9% | 22.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 21.9% (better) | 20.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 29.5% (better) | 21.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.38 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.07 |
| Interest coverage | – | 12.3× |
| Current ratio | 3.03 (better) | 2.02 |
| Altman Z-score | 15.77 (better) | 8.01 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 38.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 57.1% | 90.6% |
| Held by insiders | 17.4% | 0.72% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.0M (better) | −$32.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | 1.4% |
Go deeper
- GRMN stock overview
- GRMN income statement
- GRMN valuation and score
- KEYS stock overview
- KEYS income statement
- KEYS valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AME vs KEYS
- COHR vs KEYS
- DRS vs GRMN
- FTV vs KEYS
- GRMN vs LHX
- GRMN vs TDY
- KEYS vs KLAC
- KEYS vs MKSI
- KEYS vs RAL
- KEYS vs ROP
- KEYS vs ST
- KEYS vs TER
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.