Keysight Technologies vs Sensata Technologies
KEYS and ST side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KEYS and ST compare
Keysight Technologies is the larger company, worth 8.9 times as much as Sensata Technologies ($52.3B against $5.9B).
On earnings, Keysight Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 42.1× trailing earnings, against 67.1× for Sensata Technologies.
Keysight Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.5% versus 0.80% for Sensata Technologies).
Keysight Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.1% compared with 2.4% at Sensata Technologies.
Sensata Technologies pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Keysight Technologies does not pay one.
Keysight Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 11 for Sensata Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KEYS | ST |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $52.3B | $5.9B |
| Share price | $307.20 | $40.27 |
| Change, 1 year | 80.2% | 23.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 67.2% | −32.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 17K | 21K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 42.1× (better) | 67.1× |
| P/S | 7.9× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 8.0× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 39.2× | 15.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 35.6× | 10.1× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.8% | 9.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $245.85 | $37.27 |
| Margin of safety | −25.0% | −8.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.5% (better) | 0.80% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.0% (better) | 4.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | −19.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | −20.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.2% (better) | −27.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.7% (better) | 29.5% |
| Operating margin | 20.3% (better) | 7.5% |
| Net margin | 19.1% (better) | 2.4% |
| FCF margin | 22.3% (better) | 15.3% |
| Return on equity | 20.6% (better) | 3.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 21.3% (better) | 2.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 (better) | 0.82 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.07 | 3.86 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 12.3× (better) | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.02 | 2.29 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.01 (better) | 2.40 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 77.8% |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.43% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.6% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 0.72% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.5M | −$8.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- KEYS stock overview
- KEYS income statement
- KEYS valuation and score
- ST stock overview
- ST income statement
- ST valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AME vs KEYS
- AME vs ST
- CGNX vs ST
- COHR vs KEYS
- FTV vs KEYS
- KEYS vs KLAC
- KEYS vs MKSI
- KEYS vs RAL
- KEYS vs ROP
- KEYS vs TER
- KEYS vs TRMB
- MKSI vs ST
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.