Brixmor Property vs Kimco Realty
BRX and KIM side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRX and KIM compare
Kimco Realty is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Brixmor Property ($16.4B against $8.9B).
On earnings, Brixmor Property is cheaper: it trades at 20.7× trailing earnings, against 28.8× for Kimco Realty.
Brixmor Property grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.8% versus 4.4% for Kimco Realty).
Brixmor Property keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.8% compared with 27.8% at Kimco Realty.
Both pay dividends: Brixmor Property yields 4.2% and Kimco Realty 4.3%.
Brixmor Property scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Kimco Realty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRX | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.9B | $16.4B |
| Share price | $29.14 | $24.52 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.7% | 14.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 14.2% | 0.74% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 464 | 710 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.7× (better) | 28.8× |
| P/S | 6.4× (better) | 7.5× |
| P/B | 3.0× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.3× |
| PEG | 9.27 | – |
| Fair value | $27.83 | $22.03 |
| Margin of safety | −4.7% (better) | −11.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.8% (better) | 4.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 15.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 29.1% (better) | 1.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.2% (better) | 2.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 36.0% |
| Net margin | 30.8% (better) | 27.8% |
| Return on equity | 14.5% (better) | 5.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 7.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 2.3× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.06 | 1.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.2% | 4.3% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 18.5% (better) | 13.3% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 1.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.82% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$500K | −$199K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- BRX stock overview
- BRX income statement
- BRX valuation and score
- KIM stock overview
- KIM income statement
- KIM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.