Brixmor Property vs Federal Realty Investment Trust
BRX and FRT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRX and FRT compare
Brixmor Property and Federal Realty Investment Trust are about the same size, with market caps of $8.9B and $9.6B.
On earnings, Federal Realty Investment Trust is cheaper: it trades at 19.2× trailing earnings, against 20.7× for Brixmor Property.
Federal Realty Investment Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.4% versus 5.8% for Brixmor Property).
Federal Realty Investment Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.6% compared with 30.8% at Brixmor Property.
Both pay dividends: Brixmor Property yields 4.2% and Federal Realty Investment Trust 4.1%.
Federal Realty Investment Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Brixmor Property), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRX | FRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.9B | $9.6B |
| Share price | $29.14 | $110.19 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.7% | 15.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 14.2% | −16.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 464 | 314 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.7× | 19.2× (better) |
| P/S | 6.4× (better) | 7.3× |
| P/B | 3.0× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.8× |
| PEG | 9.27 | – |
| Fair value | $27.83 | $124.79 |
| Margin of safety | −4.7% | 11.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.8% | 7.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 8.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 29.1% | 67.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.2% | 64.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.0% (better) | 23.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 53.6% |
| Net margin | 30.8% | 38.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.5% | 15.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 17.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 3.7× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.06 | 1.44 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.2% (better) | 4.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | 13 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 18.5% (better) | 1.0% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% (better) | 4.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 98.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.82% | 0.93% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$500K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 5.5% |
Go deeper
- BRX stock overview
- BRX income statement
- BRX valuation and score
- FRT stock overview
- FRT income statement
- FRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.