Simon Property vs Weyerhaeuser
SPG and WY side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SPG and WY compare
Simon Property is the larger company, worth 4.8 times as much as Weyerhaeuser ($70.5B against $14.7B).
On earnings, Simon Property is cheaper: it trades at 15.4× trailing earnings, against 32.3× for Weyerhaeuser.
Simon Property grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.0% versus −1.1% for Weyerhaeuser).
Both pay dividends: Simon Property yields 4.1% and Weyerhaeuser 4.1%.
Simon Property scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Weyerhaeuser), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SPG | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $70.5B | $14.7B |
| Share price | $217.75 | $20.35 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.4% | −12.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 27.7% | −46.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 3,600 | 9,517 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.4× (better) | 32.3× |
| P/S | 10.2× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 15.9× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.2× (better) | 14.8× |
| P/FCF | 21.9× | – |
| PEG | 0.52 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.6% | – |
| Fair value | $214.00 | $17.30 |
| Margin of safety | −1.7% (better) | −17.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.0% (better) | −1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.7% (better) | −1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 36.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 119% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 31.6% (better) | −15.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 15.0% |
| Operating margin | 47.4% (better) | 11.7% |
| Net margin | – | 6.5% |
| FCF margin | 46.4% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 112% (better) | 5.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.57 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.75 |
| Interest coverage | 3.1× | 3.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | – | 1.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.52 | 2.01 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% | 4.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 134% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.3% | 10.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% | 4.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.5% | 97.4% |
| Held by insiders | 4.0% | 0.40% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$448K (better) | −$1.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- SPG stock overview
- SPG income statement
- SPG valuation and score
- WY stock overview
- WY income statement
- WY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.