Marvell Technology vs ON Semiconductor
MRVL and ON side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MRVL and ON compare
Marvell Technology is the larger company, worth 6.2 times as much as ON Semiconductor ($172B against $27.9B).
On earnings, ON Semiconductor is cheaper: it trades at 45.9× trailing earnings, against 64.8× for Marvell Technology.
Marvell Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.6% versus −3.1% for ON Semiconductor).
Marvell Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.9% compared with 10.2% at ON Semiconductor.
Marvell Technology pays a dividend yielding 0.12%; ON Semiconductor does not pay one.
Marvell Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 8 for ON Semiconductor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MRVL | ON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $172B | $27.9B |
| Share price | $196.40 | $71.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 118% | 39.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 173% | 21.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.99 | 1.58 |
| Employees | 7,480 | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 64.8× | 45.9× (better) |
| P/S | 18.2× | 4.5× (better) |
| P/B | 9.3× | 3.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 111× | 19.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 99.5× | 18.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.0% | 5.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $75.71 | $51.54 |
| Margin of safety | −159% | −39.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 30.6% (better) | −3.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.5% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 35.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 45.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −12.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.2% (better) | 37.7% |
| Operating margin | 16.5% (better) | 10.8% |
| Net margin | 27.9% (better) | 10.2% |
| FCF margin | 18.3% | 24.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 16.5% (better) | 8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% (better) | 6.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 (better) | 0.62 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.66 | 0.41 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 7.2× | 10.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.17 | 3.46 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 12.30 (better) | 4.64 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | – |
| Payout ratio | 7.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | 5.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.7% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 0.37% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$49.6M | −$20.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 7.7% |
Go deeper
- MRVL stock overview
- MRVL income statement
- MRVL valuation and score
- ON stock overview
- ON income statement
- ON valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.