Monolithic Power Systems vs ON Semiconductor
MPWR and ON side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MPWR and ON compare
Monolithic Power Systems is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as ON Semiconductor ($59.5B against $27.9B).
On earnings, ON Semiconductor is cheaper: it trades at 45.9× trailing earnings, against 74.0× for Monolithic Power Systems.
Monolithic Power Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.7% versus −3.1% for ON Semiconductor).
Monolithic Power Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.5% compared with 10.2% at ON Semiconductor.
Monolithic Power Systems pays a dividend yielding 0.62%; ON Semiconductor does not pay one.
Monolithic Power Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for ON Semiconductor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MPWR | ON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $59.5B | $27.9B |
| Share price | $1211.63 | $71.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.7% | 39.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 122% | 21.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.89 | 1.58 |
| Employees | 4,501 | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 74.0× | 45.9× (better) |
| P/S | 18.2× | 4.5× (better) |
| P/B | 15.3× | 3.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 58.1× | 19.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 102× | 18.6× (better) |
| PEG | 5.96 | – |
| FCF yield | 0.98% | 5.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $695.14 | $51.54 |
| Margin of safety | −74.3% | −39.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.7% (better) | −3.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.0% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −52.0% | 35.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −52.5% | 45.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.7% (better) | −12.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.2% (better) | 37.7% |
| Operating margin | 28.7% (better) | 10.8% |
| Net margin | 24.5% (better) | 10.2% |
| FCF margin | 17.9% | 24.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 22.6% (better) | 8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 33.7% (better) | 6.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.62 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.41 |
| Interest coverage | – | 10.9× |
| Current ratio | 4.98 (better) | 3.46 |
| Altman Z-score | 47.90 (better) | 4.64 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | – |
| Payout ratio | 41.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 25.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 5.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.62% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.9% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 3.6% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$728M | −$20.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 7.7% |
Go deeper
- MPWR stock overview
- MPWR income statement
- MPWR valuation and score
- ON stock overview
- ON income statement
- ON valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.