ON Semiconductor vs Qnity Electronics
ON and Q side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ON and Q compare
ON Semiconductor and Qnity Electronics are about the same size, with market caps of $27.9B and $24.4B.
Qnity Electronics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.8% versus −3.1% for ON Semiconductor).
Qnity Electronics pays a dividend yielding 0.26%; ON Semiconductor does not pay one.
ON Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Qnity Electronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ON | Q |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.9B | $24.4B |
| Share price | $71.67 | $116.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.4% | 24.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 21.2% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.58 | 1.69 |
| Employees | 26K | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 45.9× | – |
| P/S | 4.5× (better) | 4.7× |
| P/B | 3.9× | 3.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.5× (better) | 22.0× |
| P/FCF | 18.6× (better) | 29.6× |
| FCF yield | 5.4% (better) | 3.4% |
| Fair value | $51.54 | $124.66 |
| Margin of safety | −39.1% | 6.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.1% | 14.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 35.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 45.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −12.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.7% | 46.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 10.8% | – |
| Net margin | 10.2% | – |
| FCF margin | 24.2% (better) | 15.8% |
| Return on equity | 8.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.62 | 0.55 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.41 (better) | 2.42 |
| Interest coverage | 10.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.46 (better) | 2.01 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.64 (better) | 2.67 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.26% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 5.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% (better) | 0.26% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 77.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.52% | 0.14% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.1M | −$503K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.7% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- ON stock overview
- ON income statement
- ON valuation and score
- Q stock overview
- Q income statement
- Q valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.