Amkor Technology vs Marvell Technology
AMKR and MRVL side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMKR and MRVL compare
Marvell Technology is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as Amkor Technology ($172B against $9.8B).
On earnings, Amkor Technology is cheaper: it trades at 17.7× trailing earnings, against 64.8× for Marvell Technology.
Marvell Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.6% versus 17.9% for Amkor Technology).
Marvell Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.9% compared with 7.4% at Amkor Technology.
Both pay dividends: Amkor Technology yields 0.85% and Marvell Technology 0.12%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMKR | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.8B | $172B |
| Share price | $39.50 | $196.40 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.8% | 118% |
| Change, 5 years | 67.9% | 173% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.94 | 1.99 |
| Employees | 31K | 7,480 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 16 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.7× (better) | 64.8× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 18.2× |
| P/B | 2.1× (better) | 9.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× (better) | 111× |
| P/FCF | – | 99.5× |
| FCF yield | −1.8% | 1.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $64.08 | $75.71 |
| Margin of safety | 38.4% (better) | −159% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.9% | 30.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | 22.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 82.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 81.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.5% | 52.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.6% | 16.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.4% | 27.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.3% | 18.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.6% | 16.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.6% (better) | 6.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 | 0.27 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.02 | 0.66 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 8.4× (better) | 7.2× |
| Current ratio | 2.17 | 3.17 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.87 | 12.30 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.85% (better) | 0.12% |
| Payout ratio | 14.9% | 7.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 52.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.85% | 1.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 46.8% | 79.7% |
| Held by insiders | 30.8% | 0.37% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$992M | −$49.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 2.8% |
Go deeper
- AMKR stock overview
- AMKR income statement
- AMKR valuation and score
- MRVL stock overview
- MRVL income statement
- MRVL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.