Mid America Apartment Communities vs Regency Centers
MAA and REG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAA and REG compare
Mid America Apartment Communities and Regency Centers are about the same size, with market caps of $13.6B and $13.7B.
Regency Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 0.77% for Mid America Apartment Communities).
Regency Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.4% compared with 17.6% at Mid America Apartment Communities.
Both pay dividends: Mid America Apartment Communities yields 5.2% and Regency Centers 4.0%.
Regency Centers scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Mid America Apartment Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAA | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.6B | $13.7B |
| Share price | $117.21 | $74.59 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.2% | 7.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −42.1% | −1.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 2,507 | 507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.5× | – |
| P/S | 6.1× (better) | 8.4× |
| P/B | 2.5× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.0× | 8.6× (better) |
| Fair value | $107.74 | $73.72 |
| Margin of safety | −8.8% | −1.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.77% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | 8.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.1% | 37.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −31.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 72.0% |
| Net margin | 17.6% | 34.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.8% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 13.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.48 | 1.79 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.2% (better) | 4.0% |
| Payout ratio | 182% | 95.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.7% (better) | 3.8% |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% (better) | 4.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.0% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.66% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$923K (better) | −$40.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | – |
Go deeper
- MAA stock overview
- MAA income statement
- MAA valuation and score
- REG stock overview
- REG income statement
- REG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.