Huntington Ingalls Industries vs Oshkosh
HII and OSK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HII and OSK compare
Huntington Ingalls Industries is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Oshkosh ($12.5B against $8.6B).
Huntington Ingalls Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.6% versus −0.68% for Oshkosh).
Both pay dividends: Huntington Ingalls Industries yields 1.7% and Oshkosh 1.6%.
Huntington Ingalls Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 11 for Oshkosh), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HII | OSK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.5B | $8.6B |
| Share price | $316.88 | $139.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.2% | 12.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 63.3% | 21.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 44K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.0× | – |
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× | 8.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 38.2× | 10.3× (better) |
| PEG | 7.94 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 9.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $304.42 | $113.82 |
| Margin of safety | −4.1% (better) | −22.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.6% (better) | −0.68% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.9% (better) | 4.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 16.6% |
| Operating margin | 5.8% | 8.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.4% | – |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 8.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.26 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.11 | 0.83 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 7.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.26 | 1.63 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.94 | 3.20 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% (better) | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | 29.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 13.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 5.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.9% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 0.95% | 0.79% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.8M | −$2.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- HII stock overview
- HII income statement
- HII valuation and score
- OSK stock overview
- OSK income statement
- OSK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.