Federal Signal vs Oshkosh
FSS and OSK side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FSS and OSK compare
Oshkosh is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Federal Signal ($8.6B against $6.9B).
Federal Signal grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus −0.68% for Oshkosh).
Both pay dividends: Federal Signal yields 0.52% and Oshkosh 1.6%.
Federal Signal scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 11 for Oshkosh), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FSS | OSK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.9B | $8.6B |
| Share price | $112.67 | $139.94 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.2% | 12.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 143% | 21.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 5,800 | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.3× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 4.6× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.0× | 8.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 20.3× | 10.3× (better) |
| PEG | 0.91 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.9% | 9.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $87.41 | $113.82 |
| Margin of safety | −28.9% | −22.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.0% (better) | −0.68% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.0% (better) | 4.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 20.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.2% (better) | 16.6% |
| Operating margin | 16.2% (better) | 8.1% |
| Net margin | 11.7% | – |
| FCF margin | 13.9% (better) | 8.0% |
| Return on equity | 20.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 18.0% (better) | 12.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.30 | 0.26 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.80 (better) | 0.83 |
| Interest coverage | 19.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.74 (better) | 1.63 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.07 (better) | 3.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 1.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 12.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 11 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.8% | 13.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 3.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.53% | 5.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 2.5% | 0.79% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.8M | −$2.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.4% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- FSS stock overview
- FSS income statement
- FSS valuation and score
- OSK stock overview
- OSK income statement
- OSK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.