Huntington Ingalls Industries vs Textron
HII and TXT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HII and TXT compare
Textron is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Huntington Ingalls Industries ($14.7B against $12.5B).
On earnings, Textron is cheaper: it trades at 15.4× trailing earnings, against 17.0× for Huntington Ingalls Industries.
Huntington Ingalls Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.6% versus 8.5% for Textron).
Textron keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.3% compared with 5.4% at Huntington Ingalls Industries.
Both pay dividends: Huntington Ingalls Industries yields 1.7% and Textron 0.09%.
Textron scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 14 for Huntington Ingalls Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HII | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.5B | $14.7B |
| Share price | $316.88 | $85.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.2% | 7.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 63.3% | 10.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 44K | 34K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.0× | 15.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | – | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 38.2× | 18.2× (better) |
| PEG | 7.94 | 1.83 (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 5.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $304.42 | $114.00 |
| Margin of safety | −4.1% | 24.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.6% (better) | 8.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.9% (better) | 4.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.8% (better) | 17.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.4% (better) | 22.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 5.8% | – |
| Net margin | 5.4% | 6.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 5.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 12.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.11 | – |
| Interest coverage | 7.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.26 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.94 (better) | 2.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% (better) | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | 29.6% | 1.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 5.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 5.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.9% | 92.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.95% | 0.77% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.8M (better) | −$29.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- HII stock overview
- HII income statement
- HII valuation and score
- TXT stock overview
- TXT income statement
- TXT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.