Huntington Ingalls Industries vs TransDigm
HII and TDG side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HII and TDG compare
TransDigm is the larger company, worth 5.1 times as much as Huntington Ingalls Industries ($63.4B against $12.5B).
On earnings, Huntington Ingalls Industries is cheaper: it trades at 17.0× trailing earnings, against 32.1× for TransDigm.
TransDigm grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.6% versus 12.6% for Huntington Ingalls Industries).
TransDigm keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.3% compared with 5.4% at Huntington Ingalls Industries.
Huntington Ingalls Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; TransDigm does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HII | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.5B | $63.4B |
| Share price | $316.88 | $1146.81 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.2% | −12.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 63.3% | 72.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 1.03 |
| Employees | 44K | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 14 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.0× (better) | 32.1× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 6.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× (better) | 18.6× |
| P/FCF | 38.2× | 32.9× (better) |
| PEG | 7.94 | 0.95 (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 3.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $304.42 | $1439.70 |
| Margin of safety | −4.1% | 20.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.6% | 16.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | 11.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.8% (better) | 10.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.4% (better) | 10.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.1% | 29.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 59.6% |
| Operating margin | 5.8% | 46.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.4% | 21.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 19.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 19.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.11 (better) | 5.97 |
| Interest coverage | 7.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.26 | 3.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.94 (better) | 1.74 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Payout ratio | 29.6% | 249% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 2.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.9% | 95.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.95% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.8M (better) | −$484M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- HII stock overview
- HII income statement
- HII valuation and score
- TDG stock overview
- TDG income statement
- TDG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.