Oshkosh vs Paccar
OSK and PCAR side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OSK and PCAR compare
Paccar is the larger company, worth 6.2 times as much as Oshkosh ($53.6B against $8.6B).
Oshkosh grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.68% versus −10.6% for Paccar).
Both pay dividends: Oshkosh yields 1.6% and Paccar 1.3%.
Oshkosh scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Paccar), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OSK | PCAR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.6B | $53.6B |
| Share price | $139.94 | $101.91 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.1% | 3.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 21.5% | 69.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 18K | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 21.4× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.9× (better) | 14.0× |
| P/FCF | 10.3× (better) | 14.5× |
| FCF yield | 9.7% (better) | 6.9% |
| Fair value | $113.82 | $74.08 |
| Margin of safety | −22.9% (better) | −37.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.68% (better) | −10.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.5% | 8.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −18.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −18.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 12.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.6% | 20.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.1% | – |
| Net margin | – | 9.0% |
| FCF margin | 8.0% | 13.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 12.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.26 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.83 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.63 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 3.20 (better) | 2.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% (better) | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 57.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 11 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.4% (better) | 0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 74.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.79% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$28.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- OSK stock overview
- OSK income statement
- OSK valuation and score
- PCAR stock overview
- PCAR income statement
- PCAR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.