Extra Space Storage vs Lineage
EXR and LINE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXR and LINE compare
Extra Space Storage is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as Lineage ($33.0B against $8.0B).
Extra Space Storage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.1% versus −0.06% for Lineage).
Extra Space Storage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.9% compared with −4.2% at Lineage.
Both pay dividends: Extra Space Storage yields 4.1% and Lineage 6.1%.
Extra Space Storage scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 8 for Lineage), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXR | LINE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $33.0B | $8.0B |
| Share price | $158.20 | $34.93 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.1% | 1.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.7% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.42 |
| Employees | 8,393 | 24K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.2× | – |
| P/S | 9.5× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.6× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.5× (better) | 15.4× |
| P/FCF | 21.3× (better) | 306× |
| FCF yield | 4.7% (better) | 0.33% |
| Fair value | $124.89 | $29.47 |
| Margin of safety | −26.7% | −18.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.1% (better) | −0.06% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.0% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 73.0% (better) | 31.4% |
| Operating margin | 43.8% (better) | 1.4% |
| Net margin | 29.9% (better) | −4.2% |
| FCF margin | 44.7% (better) | 0.49% |
| Return on equity | 7.9% (better) | −2.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.1% (better) | 0.42% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.89 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 6.64 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.3× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.05 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.50 (better) | 0.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% | 6.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 132% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.5% | 6.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 33.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.4M | $2.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | – |
Go deeper
- EXR stock overview
- EXR income statement
- EXR valuation and score
- LINE stock overview
- LINE income statement
- LINE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.