Extra Space Storage vs Lamar Advertising
EXR and LAMR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXR and LAMR compare
Extra Space Storage is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Lamar Advertising ($32.0B against $16.0B).
On earnings, Lamar Advertising is cheaper: it trades at 28.7× trailing earnings, against 30.8× for Extra Space Storage.
Lamar Advertising grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.4% versus 4.1% for Extra Space Storage).
Extra Space Storage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.9% compared with 23.9% at Lamar Advertising.
Both pay dividends: Extra Space Storage yields 4.3% and Lamar Advertising 4.2%.
Extra Space Storage scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Lamar Advertising), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXR | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $32.0B | $16.0B |
| Share price | $151.32 | $157.53 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.7% | 35.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −22.2% | 29.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.86 | 1.03 |
| Employees | 8,393 | 3,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.8× | 28.7× (better) |
| P/S | 9.2× | 6.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.1× (better) | 18.1× |
| P/FCF | 20.6× (better) | 22.3× |
| PEG | – | 2.81 |
| FCF yield | 4.9% (better) | 4.5% |
| Fair value | $124.86 | $112.74 |
| Margin of safety | −21.2% (better) | −39.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.1% | 4.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.0% (better) | 7.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.5% | 26.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.8% | 27.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.3% | 19.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 73.0% (better) | 67.4% |
| Operating margin | 43.8% (better) | 31.8% |
| Net margin | 29.9% (better) | 23.9% |
| FCF margin | 44.7% (better) | 30.9% |
| Return on equity | 7.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 11.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.20 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.5× |
| Current ratio | – | 0.63 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.46 | 2.00 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% (better) | 4.2% |
| Payout ratio | 132% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.5% | 20.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.5% (better) | −0.10% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.8% (better) | 4.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.4% | 84.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 13.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$3.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- EXR stock overview
- EXR income statement
- EXR valuation and score
- LAMR stock overview
- LAMR income statement
- LAMR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.