Crown Castle vs Public Storage
CCI and PSA side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCI and PSA compare
Public Storage is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Crown Castle ($57.0B against $37.7B).
On earnings, Public Storage is cheaper: it trades at 31.0× trailing earnings, against 45.0× for Crown Castle.
Public Storage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus −4.6% for Crown Castle).
Public Storage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 41.8% compared with 20.7% at Crown Castle.
Both pay dividends: Crown Castle yields 4.8% and Public Storage 3.7%.
Public Storage scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Crown Castle), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCI | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $37.7B | $57.0B |
| Share price | $88.69 | $324.77 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.9% | 12.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −50.8% | 0.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 4,000 | 5,770 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 45.0× | 31.0× (better) |
| P/S | 9.1× (better) | 11.7× |
| P/B | – | 6.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.6× | 16.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 15.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 6.4% | – |
| Fair value | $66.32 | $252.73 |
| Margin of safety | −33.7% | −28.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.6% | 3.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.1% | 10.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 12.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 14.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −15.5% | 7.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 97.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 47.7% | – |
| Net margin | 20.7% | 41.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 57.8% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 22.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.46 (better) | −0.07 |
| Interest coverage | 2.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.52 | – |
| Altman Z-score | −0.03 | 3.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.8% (better) | 3.7% |
| Payout ratio | −267% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −0.74% | 8.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 2.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.4% (better) | 3.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.4% | 87.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.11% | 10.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$854K | −$772K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.2% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- CCI stock overview
- CCI income statement
- CCI valuation and score
- PSA stock overview
- PSA income statement
- PSA valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AMT vs CCI
- CCI vs O
- CCI vs SBAC
- CUBE vs PSA
- EXR vs PSA
- IRM vs PSA
- LINE vs PSA
- O vs PSA
- PSA vs SPG
- PSA vs VICI
- PSA vs WY
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.