Crown Castle vs SBA Communications
CCI and SBAC side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCI and SBAC compare
Crown Castle is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as SBA Communications ($37.7B against $19.9B).
On earnings, SBA Communications is cheaper: it trades at 20.2× trailing earnings, against 45.0× for Crown Castle.
SBA Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.4% versus −4.6% for Crown Castle).
SBA Communications keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.5% compared with 20.7% at Crown Castle.
Both pay dividends: Crown Castle yields 4.8% and SBA Communications 2.6%.
SBA Communications scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for Crown Castle), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCI | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $37.7B | $19.9B |
| Share price | $88.69 | $187.15 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.9% | −1.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −50.8% | −45.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.72 |
| Employees | 4,000 | 1,844 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 45.0× | 20.2× (better) |
| P/S | 9.1× | 6.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.6× | 19.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 15.7× (better) | 19.2× |
| PEG | – | 0.62 |
| FCF yield | 6.4% (better) | 5.2% |
| Fair value | $66.32 | $223.12 |
| Margin of safety | −33.7% | 16.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.6% | 5.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.1% | 6.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 12.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 14.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −15.5% | 116% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 97.5% (better) | 75.2% |
| Operating margin | 47.7% (better) | 47.6% |
| Net margin | 20.7% | 34.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 57.8% (better) | 36.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 15.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.46 (better) | 7.33 |
| Interest coverage | 2.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.52 (better) | 0.17 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.03 | 0.14 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.8% (better) | 2.6% |
| Payout ratio | −267% | 51.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −0.74% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.4% (better) | 2.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.4% | 98.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.11% | 0.63% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$854K | −$54.8K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.2% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- CCI stock overview
- CCI income statement
- CCI valuation and score
- SBAC stock overview
- SBAC income statement
- SBAC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.