Antero Resources vs Permian Resources
AR and PR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AR and PR compare
Permian Resources is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Antero Resources ($21.8B against $12.9B).
On earnings, Antero Resources is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 17.2× for Permian Resources.
Antero Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.8% versus 12.8% for Permian Resources).
Permian Resources pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Antero Resources does not pay one.
Permian Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Antero Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AR | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.9B | $21.8B |
| Share price | $42.08 | $26.02 |
| Change, 1 year | 33.1% | 108% |
| Change, 5 years | 100% | 240% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 632 | 515 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× (better) | 17.2× |
| P/S | 2.1× (better) | 3.8× |
| P/B | 1.6× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× (better) | 12.0× |
| Fair value | $43.02 | $19.60 |
| Margin of safety | 2.2% (better) | −32.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.8% (better) | 12.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.6% | 54.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 8.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 130% (better) | −1.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 24.7% | 35.8% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 21.5% |
| Return on equity | – | 11.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.0% (better) | 11.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 | 0.25 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.13 (better) | 1.39 |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.00 | 2.80 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 40.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.1% | 91.3% |
| Held by insiders | 6.5% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.8M (better) | −$90.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- AR stock overview
- AR income statement
- AR valuation and score
- PR stock overview
- PR income statement
- PR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.