Antero Resources vs SM Energy
AR and SM side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AR and SM compare
Antero Resources is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as SM Energy ($12.9B against $9.6B).
On earnings, SM Energy is cheaper: it trades at 7.9× trailing earnings, against 12.1× for Antero Resources.
SM Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (75.4% versus 25.8% for Antero Resources).
SM Energy pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; Antero Resources does not pay one.
SM Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Antero Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AR | SM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.9B | $9.6B |
| Share price | $42.08 | $40.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 33.1% | 95.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 100% | 9.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 632 | 1,241 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× | 7.9× (better) |
| P/S | 2.1× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× | 5.5× (better) |
| Fair value | $43.02 | $45.25 |
| Margin of safety | 2.2% | 10.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.8% | 75.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.6% | 22.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 23.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 130% (better) | −27.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 74.2% |
| Operating margin | 24.7% | 29.6% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 18.2% |
| Return on equity | – | 16.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.0% | 21.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.13 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.00 (better) | 1.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 18.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 109% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.1% | 96.7% |
| Held by insiders | 6.5% | 0.90% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.8M | −$1.6M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- AR stock overview
- AR income statement
- AR valuation and score
- SM stock overview
- SM income statement
- SM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.