Permian Resources vs Range Resources
PR and RRC side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PR and RRC compare
Permian Resources is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Range Resources ($21.8B against $12.8B).
On earnings, Range Resources is cheaper: it trades at 15.1× trailing earnings, against 17.2× for Permian Resources.
Range Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.2% versus 12.8% for Permian Resources).
Range Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.0% compared with 21.5% at Permian Resources.
Both pay dividends: Permian Resources yields 2.4% and Range Resources 0.71%.
Permian Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Range Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PR | RRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.8B | $12.8B |
| Share price | $26.02 | $54.63 |
| Change, 1 year | 108% | 56.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 240% | 127% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 515 | 564 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.2× | 15.1× (better) |
| P/S | 3.8× | 3.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.0× | – |
| Fair value | $19.60 | $46.91 |
| Margin of safety | −32.7% | −16.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.8% | 23.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 54.2% (better) | 9.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 8.4% | 79.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1.9% | 81.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 93.9% |
| Operating margin | 35.8% | – |
| Net margin | 21.5% | 25.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.5% | 19.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 11.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.25 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.39 | – |
| Interest coverage | 7.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.80 | 3.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 0.71% |
| Payout ratio | 40.9% | 10.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% (better) | 0.71% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 7.5% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$90.7M | −$4.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 11.3% |
Go deeper
- PR stock overview
- PR income statement
- PR valuation and score
- RRC stock overview
- RRC income statement
- RRC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.