Antero Resources vs Ovintiv
AR and OVV side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AR and OVV compare
Ovintiv is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Antero Resources ($20.0B against $12.9B).
On earnings, Antero Resources is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 20.6× for Ovintiv.
Antero Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.8% versus 6.0% for Ovintiv).
Ovintiv pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Antero Resources does not pay one.
Ovintiv scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Antero Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AR | OVV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.9B | $20.0B |
| Share price | $42.08 | $72.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 33.1% | 96.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 100% | 96.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 632 | 1,465 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× (better) | 20.6× |
| P/S | 2.1× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× (better) | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× (better) | 7.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 8.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 11.3% |
| Fair value | $43.02 | $46.06 |
| Margin of safety | 2.2% (better) | −57.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.8% (better) | 6.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.6% (better) | 7.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 54.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 130% (better) | 56.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 24.7% (better) | 9.7% |
| Net margin | – | 9.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 23.2% |
| Return on equity | – | 8.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.0% (better) | 6.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 (better) | 0.32 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.13 | 0.96 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.40 | 1.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.00 | 2.36 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 35.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 26.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.1% | 93.1% |
| Held by insiders | 6.5% | 0.48% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.8M | −$5.7M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- AR stock overview
- AR income statement
- AR valuation and score
- OVV stock overview
- OVV income statement
- OVV valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.